Warning: exif_imagetype(): stream does not support seeking in /home/customer/www/getitinwriting.net/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3286
Skip to main content

When most people think of stereo recording, the first thing that comes to mind is a matched pair of mics, arranged in a coincident (X-Y) pattern. It makes sense, of course, since that’s the closest way to replicate a real pair of human ears.

But while X-Y miking is the most obvious method, it’s not the only game in town. Mid-Side (M-S) miking is a technique that sounds a bit more complex (okay, it is a bit more complex), but offers some dramatic advantages over standard coincident miking. If you’ve never heard of M-S miking, or you’ve been afraid to try it, you’re missing a powerful secret weapon in your recording arsenal.

More Than Meets the Ears

Mid-Side miking is hardly a new concept – it was devised by EMI engineer Alan Blumlein, an early pioneer of stereophonic and surround sound. Blumein patented the technique in 1933, and used it on some of the earliest stereophonic recordings.

Traditional X-Y miking mimics our own ears. Like human hearing, X-Y miking relies on the time delay of a sound arriving at one mic (ear) milliseconds sooner than the other to “localize” a sound within a stereo field. It’s a fairly simple concept, and one that works well as long as both mics are closely matched and evenly spaced to obtain an accurate sonic image.

One of the weaknesses of X-Y miking is the fact that you’re stuck with whatever you’ve recorded. There’s little flexibility for changing the stereo image once it’s been committed to disk or tape. And in some cases, collapsing the tracks into mono can result in some phase cancellation.

M-S miking, by comparison, creates a stereo image using a center (“Mid”) microphone, combining it with the sound of dual “Side” mics, each 180 degrees out of phase with the other. The loudness or intensity of each sound in the right or left channel, and how it interacts with the sound in the center channel, is what makes it work.

The M-S technique gives you more control over the width of the stereo spread than other miking techniques do, and you can make adjustments at any time after the recording is finished. (More on this in a moment.)

The technique is used extensively in broadcast, largely because properly recorded M-S tracks are always mono-compatible. M-S is also a popular technique for studio and concert recording, and its convenience and flexibility make it a good choice for live recording as well.

What You Need

While X-Y miking requires a matched pair of mics to create a consistent image, M-S miking often uses two completely different mics. At the very least, the technique typically uses mics set to different pickup patterns.

The “Mid” microphone is set up facing the center of the sound source. Typically, this mic would be a cardioid or hyper-cardioid pattern (although some variations of the technique use an omni or figure-8 pattern). The “Side” mic requirement is more stringent, in that it must be a figure-8 pattern. This mic is aimed 90 degrees off axis from the sound source. Both mic capsules should be placed as closely as possible, typically one above the other.

How it Works

It’s not uncommon for musicians to be intimidated by the complexity of M-S recording, and I’ve watched more than one person’s eyes glaze over at an explanation of it. But at its most basic, the M-S miking technique is actually not all that complicated. The concept is that one mic (Mid) acts as a center channel, while the Side channel creates ambience and directionality by adding or subtracting information from either side.

The Side mic’s figure-8 pattern, aimed at 90 degrees from the source, picks up ambient and reverberant sound coming from the sides of the sound stage. Since it’s a figure-8 pattern, the two sides are 180 degrees out of phase. In other words, a positive charge to one side of the mic’s diaphragm creates an equal negative charge to the other side. (Important: the front of the mic, which represents the “plus” side, is usually pointed to the left of the sound stage, while the rear, or “minus” side, is pointed right. It’s possible to reverse the mic’s orientation, but important to know which side is which when decoding the info later on.)

The signal from each microphone is then recorded to its own track. Now, here’s where it gets a bit confusing: to hear a proper stereo image when listening to the recording, the tracks need to be matrixed and decoded.

Although you have recorded only two channels of audio (Mid and Side), the next step is to split the Side mic’s signal into two separate channels. This is done by bringing the Side signal up on two channels and reversing the phase of one of them. (Depending on your recording setup, this can be done on your hardware mixer or within your DAW software.) Pan one side hard left, the other hard right. The resulting two channels represent exactly what both sides of your figure-8 (Side) mic were hearing.

Now you’ve got three channels – the Mid (center) and two Side channels – that must be balanced to re-create a stereo image. (Here’s where it gets a little confusing, so hang on tight.) M-S decoding works by what’s called a “sum and difference matrix,” adding one of the Side signals (the “plus” side) to the Mid signal for the sum, and subtracting the other Side signal (the “minus” side) to the Mid signal for the difference.

If you’re not completely confused by now, here’s the actual mathematical formula:

Mid + Side = left channel

Mid + (-Side) = right channel

Now, if you listen to just the Mid channel, you get a mono signal. Bring up the two side channels and you’ll hear a stereo spread. Here’s the really cool part: the width of the stereo field can be varied by the amount of Side channel in the mix!

Why It Works

An instrument at dead center (0 degrees) creates a sound that enters the Mid mic directly on-axis. But that same sound hits the null spot of the Side (figure-8) mic. The resulting  signal is sent equally to the left and right mixer buses and speakers, resulting in a centered image.

An instrument positioned 45 degrees to the left creates a sound that hits the Mid mic and one side of the Side (figure-8) mic. Because the front of the Side mic is facing left, the sound causes a positive polarity. That positive polarity combines with the positive polarity from the Mid mic in the left channel, resulting in an increased level (sum) on the left side of the sound field.

Meanwhile, on the right channel of the Side mic, that same signal causes an out-of-phase (negative) polarity. That negative polarity combines with the Mid mic in the right channel, resulting in a reduced level (difference) on the right side.

An instrument positioned 45 degrees to the right creates exactly the opposite effect, increasing the signal to the right side while decreasing it to the left.

What’s the Advantage?

One of the biggest advantages of  M-S recording is the flexibility it provides. Since the stereo imaging is directly dependent on the amount of information coming from the side channels, raising or lowering the ratio of Mid to Side channels will create a wider or narrower stereo field. The result is that you can change the sound of your stereo recording after it’s already been recorded, something that would be impossible using a traditional X-Y arrangement.

Try some experimenting with this: listen to just the Mid channel, and you’ll hear a direct, monophonic signal. Now lower the level of the Mid channel while raising the two Side channels. As the Side signals increase and the Mid decreases, you’ll notice the stereo image gets wider, while the center moves further away. (Removing the Mid channel completely results in a signal that’s mostly ambient room sound, with very little directionality – useful for effect, but not much else.) But by starting with the direct (Mid) sound and mixing in the Side channels, you can create just the right stereo imaging for the track.

Another great benefit of M-S miking is that it provides true mono compatibility. Since the two Side channels cancel each other out when you switch the mix to mono, only the center (Mid) channel remains, giving you a perfect monaural signal. And since the Side channels also contain much of the room ambience, collapsing the mix to mono eliminates that sound, resulting in a more direct mix with increased clarity. Again, even though most X-Y miking is mono compatible, the potential for phase cancellation is greater than with M-S miking. This is one reason M-S miking has always been popular in the broadcast world.

Other Variations

While most M-S miking is done with a cardioid mic for the Mid channel, varying the Mid mic can create some interesting effects. Try an omni mic pattern on the Mid channel for dramatically increased spaciousness and extended low frequency response.

Experimenting with different combinations of mics can also make a difference. For the most part, both mics should be fairly similar in sound. This is particularly true when the sound source is large, like a piano or choir, because the channels are sharing panning information; otherwise the tone quality will vary across the stereo field. For smaller sources with a narrower stereo field, though, like an acoustic guitar, matching the mics becomes less critical. In fact, with smaller sources it’s easier to experiment with different, mismatched mics – try a brighter sounding side mic, for example, to color the stereo image and make it more spacious.

As you can see, there’s a lot more to M-S miking than meets the ear, so give it a try. Even if the technical theory behind it is a bit confusing, in practice you’ll find it to be an incredibly useful technique.

Call Now ButtonCall Us